Managing the Individual, Organizational, and Societal Challenges of Generative AI: Utopian, Dystopian, Neutropian Perspectives

  • June 13, 2023
    Call for papers published


  • August 31, 2024
    Article Submission Deadline


  • November 30, 2024
    First Review


  • July 31, 2026
    Article Final Decision

Editors

  • Varun Grover, University of Arkansas
  • Arpan Kumar Kar, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
  • Rajiv Sabherwal, University of Arkansas
  • Spyros Angelopoulos, Durham University
  • Hartmut Hoehle, University of Mannheim
  • Anik Mukherjee, Indian Institute of Management

Description

The origins of generative AI (GAI) can be traced back to the 1950s, when Alan Turing proposed a test to determine whether a machine could be perceived as intelligent enough to generate responses to questions in a way indistinguishable from a human. Later, in the 1970s, researchers developed more advanced models capable of producing more realistic and coherent outcomes. Contemporary GAI models are based on state-of-the-art neural network architectures. They combine such architectures to develop large models that outperform existing benchmarked ones. Contemporary GAI solutions can produce large amounts of contextual outputs on any specific topic. They are highly trained and sophisticated, enabling users to produce various types of AI-generated content. Although GAI has been around for a while, recent developments have brought the potential of such solutions to the forefront. In particular, LLMs have the potential to transform the way we develop textual content and communicate with one another.

The ongoing discourse on GAI seems to extol the promises of AI and the dangers. Our goal for this Special Issue is to offer a careful examination of the challenges faced in managing this powerful set of technologies for individuals, organizations, and society. Many of the challenges around GAI concern data. As per a Forbes report, over 90% of internet data will be produced by GAI models, triggering serious concerns about harmful and abusive content generation. Most current GAI-triggered use involves chat-based digital assistants. While the outcome of GAI in these digital assistant-based applications is indeed remarkable, their effectiveness depends on the level of task specificity and the need for information synthesis.

At the individual level, a number of challenges exist on how to effectively use GAI to augment individual productivity. For instance, how can GAI-based interactions positively or negatively affect customer experiences, how can GAI augment (vs. replace) human skills, and broader questions of how over-reliance on GAI systems may adversely impact the cognitive inability of users and learners. At the organizational level, there are many challenges around governance. For instance, how can we govern the quality of content by GAI, how can the adoption of GAI lead to disruption, how do we set up appropriate governance structures to manage GAI projects, and how can we avoid unintended consequences of GAI adoption in firms? At the societal level, there are extensive challenges around misinformation, bias, and privacy. Our broad goal for the special issue is to attract papers that articulate the challenges theoretically and study them empirically, while making a strong contribution to the theory and practice in the deployment of GAI.

Potential topics

  • Challenges in managing GAI for individuals, organizations, and society
  • Impact of GAI on individual productivity and customer experiences
  • Governance challenges related to content quality generated by GAI
  • Misinformation and privacy issues at the societal level

Associate editors

Shahriar Akter, University of Wollongong
Hillol Bala, Indiana University
Kevin Bauer, University of Mannheim
Roberta Bernardi, University of Bristol
Michael Chau, The University of Hong Kong
Alain Chong, University of Nottingham Ningbo China
Kieran Conboy, National University of Ireland Galway
Yogesh Dwivedi, Swansea University
Amany Elbanna, Royal Holloway University of London
Weiguo (Patrick) Fan, University of Iowa
Sumeet Gupta, Indian Institute of Management Raipur
Karlheinz Kautz, RMIT University
Stan Karaniosis, University of Queensland
Yeongin Kim, Virginia Commonwealth
Ajay Kumar, EM Lyon
Marijn Janssen, TU Delft
Agam Gupta, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi
Shivam Gupta, NEOMA Business School
Taha Havakhor, McGill University
Mary Lacity, University of Arkansas
Xin (Robert) Luo, University of New Mexico
Patrick Mikalef, Norwegian University of Science & Tech
Ilias O Pappas, University of Agder
Uthaysankar Sivarajah, University of Bradford
Kai Spohrer, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management
Sujeet Sharma, Indian Institute of Management Nagpur
Samuel Fosso Wamba, Toulouse Business School
Amber Young, University of Arkansas